Even the right-click menu doesn't list things like "open in slideshow", because the right click menu has a secret menu of its own which you have to press to see. * In general, the number of contextual commands you just have to discover by trial and error, or by looking them up on the internet, because they are hidden in the UI. You just have to know that the key for that is, and that deleting things is called moving them to the trash. * For that matter, pressing should delete files. * Speaking of pressing on files, that should open them, not rename them. do some combination of enter, tab, then enter again, except it never quite works the way you expect, and sometimes the file moves because the sorting changes after you pressed enter the first time, and for some reason pressing tab actually moves you to the next folder. You expect to rename a file, then press tab to highlight the next file, and begin typing. "But you can change this setting!" You shouldn't have to change this setting, and most people don't know it's even there. * Search within finder does not search the current context by default, it searches your entire computer. Instead it's then, and this behavior is not afforded in the UI, you just have to look it up somewhere. I believe in calm technology and I’m not going to keep replacing stuff just because it has a non-zero risk. This isn’t even mentioning stuff that’s risky like continuing to run my smart lightbulbs even though Phillips stopped supporting them years ago. Of course it’s inconvenient and I don’t want to harm others, but then I also don’t want to keep buying dumb terminals for things and companies don’t seem to be changing their support timelines. If it’s part of a botnet, I don’t care much. I won’t conduct banking, but if someone breaches my Netflix account, I don’t care much. I run old devices that aren’t patchable or supported because they still have use (YouTube/Netflix) and I use them in an appropriate way, I think. I think it’s naive to have a blanket rule like never run out of support software because sometimes we must. Of course, maybe the most recent version has an unknown zero day (negative day?) and would also be rooted. Of course maybe I’m rooted and all sorts of bad stuff, but I don’t think so. I run Catalina 10.15.7 and I think I run it secure enough. There’s no way, that I know of, to be completely secure so I’d rather be conscious than a false feeling of safety. It’s important to be conscious of security, but that doesn’t mean automatically upgrading to everything all the time. Most tech people who think this aren't in a cricical enough position to worry about something more than a keylogger or ransomware, but if you're a network engineer at Google and think this then you shouldn't be working there. >tech people who think if you do X then you're totally safe Now if you work at a big corporation you probably have a work pc that's kept updated and where you face the same security issues as anyone else.Īnd if you're a journalist or brag about the millions you made in bitcoin on twitter then you become targeted for more sophisticated attacks. Most tech people who use crypto use a hardware wallet, most banks today will get you your money back (although the merchant ends up losing money if not insured) + you can just limit your card spending if not planning a big buy, and ransomware is a non issue for me since I keep everything important on a couple external disks. Hackers just want money and it's honestly a numbers' game. Most non targeted viruses will just wait for you to copy paste some crypto private keys or credit card numbers, or encrypt your files and ask for a ransom. Meh you probably are if you're like me, a nobody. That seems like very poor risk assessment to me. Or you can just follow the recall procedure, which is a bit inconvenient but it seems much less inconvenient than facial reconstruction.Īnd if you don’t care about your data being compromised and sold to bad actors, who may then steal your identity and cause a LOT of trouble for you, then by all means run known-insecure software. So yeah, you can drive around with your faulty airbag if the possibility of getting your face mangled doesn’t bother you. One recent iOS update that comes to mind is one that patched an issue where a PDF sent via iMessage could give remote code execution with no user interaction or visibility. If you follow the discussion in the info sec community surrounding these updates, often the vulnerabilities that are patched are being actively exploited. This is actually a great analogy now, because Apple (or whoever) regularly issue “recalls” for their known-insecure software in the form of software updates. (A real issue that many manufacturers had to issue a recall for.) No, it’s like driving a car whose airbag is known to have a fault that will send shards of material into the driver’s face in the event of an accident.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |